Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05677
Original file (BC 2012 05677.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05677

	XXXXXXX	COUNSEL:  NONE
		HEARING DESIRED:  NO

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

1.  He be awarded the Meritorious Unit Commendation (MUC) 
(Army).

2.  He be awarded two Bronze Service Stars (2BSSs) for his 
previously awarded Iraq Campaign Medal (ICM) – Administratively 
Corrected. 

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He should have been awarded the MUC (Army) for his assignment to 
a military police battalion and 2BSSs for his deployment with an 
expeditionary security forces squadron, Iraq, from 11 Aug 06 to 
1 Mar 07 in support of Operation IRAQI FREEDOM (OIF).  However, 
the MUC and the BSSs for the ICM were not approved until after 
he had separated.

In support of his appeal, the applicant provides copies of his 
separation documents; decoration recommendation for the Army 
Commendation Medal, and other additional documents associated 
with his request.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant is a former enlisted member of the Regular Air 
Force, who served on active duty from  30 Jan 02through 28 Jan 
08.

AFPC/DPSIDR will administratively correct the applicant’s record 
to reflect award of the ICM, w/2 BSSs.  

________________________________________________________________


THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial of the applicant’s request for 
award of the Meritorious Unit Commendation (Army).  There is no 
documentation assigning or attaching the applicant to an army 
unit that was awarded the Meritorious Unit Commendation (Army). 
To grant award of the Meritorious Unit Commendation (Army) would 
be contrary to the criteria established by DoDM 1348.33.

DPSID notes that based on their review of the applicant's 
official military personnel record, they were able to determine 
the applicant should have been awarded the ICM, w/2BSSs for his 
service from 30 Jan 02 to 28 Jan 08 and was not reflected in his 
records.  Upon the final board decision, administrative 
correction of the applicant's official military personnel record 
will be completed by AFPC/DPSOR.

The complete DPSID evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 17 Feb 13 for review and response.  As of this 
date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D).

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice in respect to 
the applicant’s entitlement to the award of the Meritorious Unit 
Commendation (Army).  We took notice of the applicant's complete 
submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree 
with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of 
primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for 
our conclusion that relief beyond that which will be corrected 
administratively is not warranted.  Therefore, we find no basis 
to favorably consider this portion of the application.

________________________________________________________________


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application.

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2012-05677 in Executive Session on 17 Sep 13, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 1 Dec 12, w/atchs. 
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPSID, dated 11 Feb 13, w/atch.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 17 Feb 13.




                                   Panel Chair










Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02267

    Original file (BC-2010-02267.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02267 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect he was awarded the Iraq Campaign Medal with four Bronze Service Stars (ICM w/4 BSS) rather than the ICM with two Bronze Service Stars (ICM w/2 BSS); and to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03640

    Original file (BC 2014 03640.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was credited with the appropriate foreign-service for his service time in Iraq (Administratively corrected). APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He served in a combat zone in Iraq during Operation IRAQI FREEDOM for more than 90 consecutive days, but did not receive the appropriate decorations or foreign-service credit for his deployment to Iraq. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01046

    Original file (BC 2014 01046.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01046 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the following awards and decorations: Kuwait Liberation Medal-Saudi Arabia (KLM-SA) Kuwait Liberation Medal-Kuwait (KLM-K) Southwest Asia Service Medal with three Bronze Service Stars (SWASM, w/3 BSSs). The SWASM is awarded to members of the United States Armed Forces who served in support of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05171

    Original file (BC 2013 05171.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05171 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the following awards: 1. On 12 Jan 14, AFPC/DPSIDR directed the applicant’s DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to add the Global War on Terrorism Expeditionary Medal (GWOT-E), and to change “Air Force Commendation Medal” to read “Air Force Commendation...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01792

    Original file (BC 2014 01792.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicant’s request for the GWOT-E, indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. After a review of the applicant’s personnel records and Defense Finance and Accounting Service records, the applicant’s deployment in question meets...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04194

    Original file (BC-2012-04194.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04194 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded Meritorious Service Medal (MSM), Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM), and National Defense Service Medal (NDSM). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01505

    Original file (BC-2011-01505.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    DPSIDR was able to verify the applicant’s entitlement to the SWASM w/1BSS for his service in Cairo West from 11 Mar 93 to 17 Jun 93, the ACM w/ 1BSS, the Air Force Expeditionary Service Ribbon with one Bronze Oak Leaf Cluster (AFESR w/1OLC), and the NATO-ISAF for his service in Afghanistan from 4 Feb 07 to 9 Aug 07. The MUA is awarded to Air Force active duty, Reserve and Guard units for exceptionally meritorious conduct in the performance of outstanding achievement or service in direct...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04842

    Original file (BC 2013 04842.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04842 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at ExhibitS C, D and E. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID states no further action is required concerning the applicant’s request for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-00612

    Original file (BC-2009-00612.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    His records be corrected to reflect he was awarded the Afghanistan Campaign Medal (ACM), the Iraqi Campaign Medal (ICM), and the Meritorious Service Medal with five Oak Leaf Clusters (MSM w/5 OLC). _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The guidance for award of the requested medals was not available at the time he retired in 2004. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2007-02137

    Original file (BC-2007-02137.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which are at Exhibits B and D. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDR notes that while serving as a first sergeant and attached to the Army, the applicant was deployed to Balad Air Base (AB), Iraq from 5 Dec 04 to 5 Apr 05. They recommend the Board review the nominating official’s original...